I realized that it
is somewhat peculiar that every reader is looking for something new in a book
of fiction. If you read the reviews, the cause of disappointment with a book is
very often the same one. I think if somebody studies the statistics of why a book
is disliked, this particular reason might be a big percentage. Yet, people are
also skeptical about ideas that are too far-fetched. They also demand that the
concepts should be able to survive practically and that they should be germane
to the theme of real world. Why I find it peculiar is that the ideas that we
call hackneyed are the ones that we really never think about or even bother to
observe, although it is by them that we are affected the most.
I finally completed reading all of the three Mohsin Hamid's books and I think I see now what his pattern is. He simply picks up a stereotype and turns it into an enigma. Though I would like to add that the settings might not be cliché for Western audience but being a Pakistani, I can tell that all his characters are those that we already have in our minds. All the things about his characters are what we say when we talk about those class of people in general and we even have commonly used maxims for the concepts.
The characters in Moth Smoke are the general egoistic, vindictive and licentious elite class with restless and unhappy marital relationships and the hopeless, unemployed, educated and intelligent but morally timid and ease-loving middle class and the impossible friendship between the two.
The Reluctant Fundamentalist talks about what we have been hearing for years now: the changing of the attitude of West towards the Muslims after 9/11 and America's self-righteous attitude towards the East despite her own cruelty to Afghanistan and Iraq and the double-standards in her dealings with Pakistan and India. Really, this is all this book is about, yet you don’t know until the end what really is the point the writer is trying to make. The most remarkable thing is that the character Changez is just an average Muslim without any emotional attachment to his religion or his country. He is a good person culturally. He is honest and hard-working and determined to make his way into the world through honesty and hard work, but he refuses to play in the hands of a nation that was the cause of threat to the well-being of his family. Some of the quotes from the book where I think Hamid has very intelligently summed up the situation:
In short, through
the character of Changez, Hamid states what a man of principles would do in the
circumstances.So really nothing
new, but presented in a way that echoes its truthfulness.
I finally completed reading all of the three Mohsin Hamid's books and I think I see now what his pattern is. He simply picks up a stereotype and turns it into an enigma. Though I would like to add that the settings might not be cliché for Western audience but being a Pakistani, I can tell that all his characters are those that we already have in our minds. All the things about his characters are what we say when we talk about those class of people in general and we even have commonly used maxims for the concepts.
The characters in Moth Smoke are the general egoistic, vindictive and licentious elite class with restless and unhappy marital relationships and the hopeless, unemployed, educated and intelligent but morally timid and ease-loving middle class and the impossible friendship between the two.
The Reluctant Fundamentalist talks about what we have been hearing for years now: the changing of the attitude of West towards the Muslims after 9/11 and America's self-righteous attitude towards the East despite her own cruelty to Afghanistan and Iraq and the double-standards in her dealings with Pakistan and India. Really, this is all this book is about, yet you don’t know until the end what really is the point the writer is trying to make. The most remarkable thing is that the character Changez is just an average Muslim without any emotional attachment to his religion or his country. He is a good person culturally. He is honest and hard-working and determined to make his way into the world through honesty and hard work, but he refuses to play in the hands of a nation that was the cause of threat to the well-being of his family. Some of the quotes from the book where I think Hamid has very intelligently summed up the situation:
"On the
flight I noticed how many of my fellow passengers were similar to me in age:
college students and young professionals, heading back after the holidays. I
found it ironic; children and the elderly were meant to be sent away from
impending battles, but in our case it was the fittest and brightest who were
leaving, those who in the past would have been most expected to remain. I was
filled with contempt for myself, such contempt that I could not bring myself to
converse or to eat. I shut my eyes and waited, and the hours took from me the
responsibility even to flee."
"I had
always thought of America as a nation that looked forward; for the first time I
was struck by its determination to look back. Living in New York was suddenly
like living in a film about the Second World War; I, a foreigner, found myself
staring out at a set that ought to be viewed not in Technicolor but in grainy
black and white."
"that
America was engaged only in posturing. As a society, you were unwilling to
reflect upon the shared pain that united you with those who attacked you. You
retreated into myths of your own difference, assumptions of your own
superiority. And you acted out these beliefs on the stage of the world, so that
the entire planet was rocked by the repercussions of your tantrums, not least
my family, now facing war thousands of miles away. Such an America had to be
stopped in the interests not only of the rest of humanity, but also in your
own."
Then there is How To
Get Filthy Rich In Rising Asia. Here again is an image of rise and fall in the
life of a stereotyped corrupt business man, whose desire for money has its
origin in the extreme poverty and it drives him to overcome all obstacles however
he can. The most remarkable and interesting thing I found in this book is that
it is written in a very unique way. It calls itself a seIf-help book which is
supposed to instruct the reader about how to become filthy rich in contemporary
Asia. However, it does so by telling a story of nameless common man, so you can
call it a novel. It is very personalized for a self-help book and extremely
impersonal for a novel. You want to know what really is going inside the
nameless character's head what you never manage to do it as he continues his
journey through life committing crimes, giving bribes, getting married and then
divorced and then being betrayed and then finally getting together with the
love of his life. All the time, the character is a mystery and yet, he is so
typical. You might hate him or may be sympathize with him to some extent or
pity him if you could somehow know how he was feeling all the time but till the
very end, he remains as distant as ever.
Other than that,
when I started reading it, I felt that this was going to be overly skeptical
and bitterly sarcastic about the Asian culture, which I think is mostly the
South-Asian culture. It was like that in the beginning with some very crude
descriptions. But later, the tone was more resigned. It looked like one thing
was the consequence of the other and that your nameless character starts to
blend in the picture about which he was sarcastic earlier as an outsider.
As I said, his
journey through life is really nothing new to hear. He was just a common man
coming from an extremely poor family and having seen disease and death at the
hands of poverty, he obviously wanted to rise to the status of the rich. Having
no strong family background and no monetary support available and more
importantly having no regard for principles and values, he enters a life of
crime and deceit. As he rises, he has to face rivals in the form of business
competitors and the state bureaucrats. At the same time, he has to deal with a
failed marriage. The reason was probably
his never-ending love for another girl the "pretty girl", who
herself was struggling to escape the claws of poverty and secondly, may be his
own disturbed and restive mind because of the life he was living. Like I said,
you really don’t know what was going inside his head. It is a story of pursuit
of a strong financial status and of love in the time of great social and economic
upheaval.
So they are all really mundane characters in a really commonly-viewed form of world. But still Mohsin Hamid managed to make three really good books without adding any fantastical adventure in the mix.
read just the 'How to get filthy rich in rising Asia' part of your blog as I haven't read the other two books ... I have to say the book is a very interesting read and Mohsin Hamid has managed to keep the readers interested till the very end ... the overall theme of the book though is not unique ... I mean the story of someone who bribes others to get his work done and then is left alone to rot when he has no money to offer those who are in positions of power but the way Mohsin Hamid has presented it, that's unique
ReplyDeleteThanks for commenting here!
Deleteyeah. I agree. In fact, Mohsin Hamid has done the same in all three of his books. all three are really good.
will read the other two as well
Deleteit reminded of Umera Ahmed's novels ... same old story (just more anti-men) but unique presentation style
ReplyDeleteI think some of Umera Ahmed's books have quite unique stories. Moral of the story might not be unique but stories are. But Mohsin Hamid's writing style is much more mature than Umera Ahmed's.
DeleteI have read Umera Ahmed's Man-o-Salwa and Peer-e-Kamil ... I found her writings to be extremely anti-men :-P ... I've heard Amar Bail has a good story to tell
DeleteI dont think that's true. neither of man o salwa and peer e kamil are anti-men. They both deal with much bigger issues. same is true for amar bail. I have read almost all of her novels and short stories. a few of them were apparently anti-men but in context, it was not prejudice but the requirement of the topic.
DeleteLets take man o salwa. I think the best and most pious character was Karam Ali. the story had almost equal number of good and bad female and male characters. in fact i think there were more evil women in it than bad men.
In peer-e-kamil, there was nothing what you can call anti men. I mean Salar, Furqan, Dr Sibt e Ali were all portrayed as strong and pious characters.
I dont understand why you call them anti-men. If you really want to know what anti-men stories are, read Bushra Rehman's Afsana Aadmi Hai. She can make you believe that all men are monsters. (I dont like recommending it though. It is probably the book I hate the most)
WOW, you have read the books very thoroughly ... do you only like literature or have interest in poetry as well?
ReplyDeleteI used to love poetry but I have not read any for many years.
Deleteahaan sahi
Delete